Saturday, July 4, 2026

Vatican provides SSPX priests, lay faithful with procedure to return to Catholic communion after schism


VATICAN CITY (OSV News) — The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith has established a procedure for both priests and lay faithful connected to the Society of St. Pius X to return to Catholic communion, following the society’s schismatic act July 1.

The instructions are being transmitted through apostolic nunciatures, as previously announced in the Explanatory Note published by the dicastery on July 2.

Fatiguing Us into Compliance

A U.S. federal agent smashes a car window while trying to detain a man during an immigration raid in Chicago, December 17, 2025 (OSV News photo/Jim Vondruska, Reuters).

When in the course of human events it becomes necessary to read the Declaration once again, what do we find in this most hallowed of American political texts? When I sat down, with a grudging sense of Boy Scout dutifulness to revisit those 1,337 words, I saw that it was no longer the document I remembered from high school. The bits lodged in my memory were the oft-quoted glowing abstractions: “We hold these truths to be self-evident,” “all men are created equal,” “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”

July 5, 2026: Fourteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time

 

A whitewashed wooden fence in front of evergreen trees (Unsplash/Lawrence Krowdeed)

July 5, 2026: Fourteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time

After defying Pope Leo and causing schism, SSPX defends its actions

 

Newly consecrated bishops, from left, Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry and Marc Hanappier, wearing their miters and holding their pastoral staffs, pray at the end of their consecration ceremony in a tent set up outside the Society of St. Pius X seminary in Écône, Switzerland, July 1, 2026. (AP/Baz Ratner)

After defying Pope Leo and causing schism, SSPX defends its actions

ope Leo on eve of US 250: Keep working for liberty despite 'ever new challenges'

 

Pope Leo XIV appears via livestream from the Vatican during the Liberty Medal ceremony from the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia July 3, 2026. About people attended, including civic leaders, religious representatives from more than 30 faith traditions, Catholic leaders and many of the pope's longtime Augustinian friends. (NCR photo/Camillo Barone)

Pope Leo on eve of US 250: Keep working for liberty despite 'ever new challenges'

Friday, July 3, 2026

Explainer: How does excommunication work in the Catholic Church?

 

Explainer: How does excommunication work in the Catholic Church?

From left Marc Hanappier, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, Michael Goldade and Pascal Schreiber pray during their consecration ceremony as bishops in a tent set up outside the Society of St. Pius X seminary, in Econe, Switzerland, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. Credit: AP Photo/Baz Ratner

Editors’ note: This article, originally published on July 8, 2024 was updated on July 2, 2026 following the Vatican’s announcement that the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X is in schism.

Excommunication is one of those words that you don’t hear very often outside of religious circles—and when you do, it’s rarely a happy moment for anyone. In religious terms, it sounds like someone got canceled—but for eternity. However, it is also a term and a practice whose usage is often misunderstood, at least in the Catholic Church.

Analysis: SSPX excommunications show what Pope Leo means by church ‘unity’


Analysis: SSPX excommunications show what Pope Leo means by church ‘unity’

Pope Leo celebrates Mass on the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul in St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican June 29, 2026. Credit: OSV News photo/Yara Nardi, Reuters

The Vatican today took its strongest action in history against the Society of St. Pius X, declaring its bishops and priests excommunicated and in schism, and saying that any lay person who “adheres” to the schismatic group will also be subject to automatic excommunication.

The move, sparked by the ordinations of four new bishops of the SSPX in Écône, Switzerland, on July 1, goes further than even Pope John Paul II went when, in response to the first illicit ordinations of SSPX bishops in 1988, he declared that the bishops involved had been excommunicated.

In the intervening decades, the Vatican made numerous attempts to bring the SSPX back into the fold, lifting the excommunications of the bishops ordained in 1988 and opening access to the Tridentine Latin Mass to Catholics more widely, which the SSPX had requested. None of these efforts proved fruitful; the closest the two ever came to an agreement was actually in May 1988, just before the first illicit ordinations, when the SSPX founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, signed an agreement that would have regularized the SSPX’s dubious position within the Catholic Church but formally withdrew his signature the next day, ultimately going forward with the illicit ordinations on July 1, 1988.

In 1988, just as happened this week, the Vatican responded by confirming that both the ordaining and ordained bishops had incurred automatic excommunication. There are, however, some significant differences: As mentioned, the Vatican went further this time by declaring excommunicated other members of the society. Also, in contrast to Pope John Paul II’s apostolic letter “Ecclesia Dei” announcing the previous excommunications, today’s decision was signed by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, the head of the Vatican’s doctrine office, rather than Pope Leo XIV. In fact, neither the decree from the dicastery nor the note that accompanied it ever mentions the current pope by name.

Pope Leo and ‘unity in diversity’

What do these decisions tell us about Pope Leo XIV and his understanding both of the SSPX and of the church unity that is central to his papacy?

The first is that Leo understands that tensions between the Vatican and the SSPX were never primarily about the liturgy. Even after Pope Benedict XVI allowed for widespread celebration of the pre-Vatican II Mass in 2007 and lifted the excommunications of the SSPX bishops in 2009, the society’s position in the church was still not regularized because their leadership refused in 2012 to sign a “doctrinal preamble” that would recognize the Second Vatican Council as a legitimate part of Catholic tradition and teaching.

The 2012 “preamble” echoed previous attempts at reconciliation, which always involved the Vatican offering to regularize the situation of the SSPX in return for some recognition of the legitimacy of Vatican II. A similar offer was made by Cardinal Fernández earlier this year in response to SSPX’s threats to again illicitly ordain bishops. Cardinal Fernández had offered a structured theological dialogue on the “minimum requirements necessary for full communion with the Catholic Church,” including “the different degrees of adherence required by the various texts of the Second Vatican Council and their interpretation.” In return, the SSPX would be granted an official canonical status in the church. The society again rejected this offer.

Pope Leo acknowledged that it was the SSPX’s refusal to accept the teachings of Vatican II, not just the liturgical reforms that followed the council, that prevented them from rejoining the Catholic Church. He told reporters outside Castel Gandolfo recently: “They refuse to accept certain fundamental elements of the church, beginning with various points of the Second Vatican Council. And if they make those choices, I am sorry. But we must move forward.”

Today’s decision to “move forward” by declaring excommunicated at least some of the membership of the SSPX beyond its bishops reveals the limits of what views are included in the “unity in diversity” that Leo has preached as recently as June 29.

Pope Leo, the first pope to have undergone all of his seminary formation in the post-Vatican II era, has made clear that he takes the Second Vatican Council as a given, that accepting it is vital to church unity.

While past popes, especially Benedict XVI, made repeated offers to bring SSPX back into the fold in an effort to protect the church’s unity and out of a concern for the faithful whose sacraments would be rendered illicit were their clergy declared schismatic, the Vatican under Pope Leo has struck a different tone, appealing personally to SSPX’s lay members to “remain firm in communion” with Rome and not to attend SSPX celebrations or events while declaring its bishops and priests excommunicated. On July 2, the Vatican also provided procedures for both priests and lay people connected to the Society of St. Pius X to return to Catholic communion.

Following this decision, two major questions remain: First, will any sort of continued dialogue, the likes of which Cardinal Pietro Parolin expressed a desire for on July 1 following the ordinations, be possible between the SSPX and the Vatican? And second, will Pope Leo loosen Pope Francis’ restrictions on the Tridentine Latin Mass in an effort to draw more SSPX members back to Rome?

Pope Benedict XVI ended SSPX’s almost-total monopoly on the Latin Mass by extending the ability to celebrate it to any priest who asked permission, but Francis tightened restrictions on it, citing divisiveness and a lack of acceptance of Vatican II in some Latin Mass communities. How Pope Leo will address this issue, and how it fits into his vision of unity, remains to be seen.

Rising Above the Slop

Foundation of the American Government by John Henry Hintermeister (Library of Congress)

Americans are not hopeful about their democracy. Imagining a future more free and equal than the past feels difficult; imagining twenty-first-century Americans authoring such a future feels nearly impossible. The atrophied democratic imagination is, of course, connected to broader trends in our culture. It’s obvious that some cultural practices can sustain democratic hope, while others—scrolling, posting, mindless shopping, disappearing into virtual worlds—leave it to decline or, worse, actively damage it. Of course, much was deplorable about the people who founded the United States, but we can credit them for seeking to build a literary culture that could animate a project of self-government, however limited. As the American project staggers into its 250th year, we might consult their example.