The German Church’s thorny path
Clerical abuse and its damaging legacy
The Church in Germany is at a tipping point that is reminding many of events of 500 years ago, when a storm of protest was unleashed that was to change the face of Catholicism for ever
In the bright, stuccoed glory of Munich’s Theatine Church, soloists
and ensemble reflect mournfully on the Catholic Church’s darkest
disgrace. Oratio is a musical work of harrowing beauty by composer
Mathias Rehfeldt that adapts Jeremiah’s Lamentations on the fall of
Jerusalem (“They shamelessly abused us ... the crown has fallen”) to the
abuse crisis in the global Catholic Church. As the crisis reaches a
scale beyond rational understanding, the searing music of Oratio, paired
with an ancient lament of mourning and salvation, opens the ear – and
the soul – to a space no words can reach. “We wanted to send a signal
that wasn’t just a one-off but would last,” said Fr Robert Mehlhart OP,
the co-creator of the piece, conductor of its premiere and director of
music at the Theatine. “In the original, others are responsible for the
catastrophe, but in our piece the evil comes from within. Blame for
what happened in the Church cannot be shifted to those outside.”
After
three decades of clerical sexual abuse revelations in Ireland, the
United States, Australia and elsewhere – with the now familiar cycle of
media reports, brave survivors’ testimonies, reluctant enquiries, public
fury and gauche apologies – the German Church now finds itself at the
same existential tipping point. There is heated disagreement on the
causes of the crisis in Germany but, half a millennium after Martin
Luther’s stand against Rome, there is a growing consensus that a storm
of significant historical gravity is brewing.
In spite of murmurs from elsewhere of a coming schism, no one in
Germany expects history to repeat itself in a rupture with Rome. But the
sheer size, heft and wealth of Germany’s Catholic Church means that
what happens here will have a knock-on effect in Europe and in the
global Church. As the church hierarchy tries to address its abuse crisis
with one hand, its other hand is managing expectations around its
consultation process on church renewal, the so-called Synodaler Weg (the
“synodal path”). And some are pushing for more radical changes than the
bishops – and Rome – are ready to concede. The grass-roots Maria 2.0
movement demands ordination for women. The reaffirmation by the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that the Church cannot bless
same-sex partnerships triggered an unprecedented backlash – hundreds of
priests and thousands of parishioners joined the Liebe gewinnt (Love
Wins) initiative, a week-long series of blessings for same-sex couples
in churches all over Germany.
As if that weren’t enough
turbulence, this summer will bring a second report from the Archdiocese
of Munich and Freising into abuse allegations which may cast an
unflattering eye on the five-year term of Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger
there before he left for Rome in 1982. A decade after the first, this
new report is expected to be an even deeper dive into diocesan records;
if the 94-year-old Pope emeritus is named as being aware of abuse – or a
cover-up of abuse – and not having taken appropriate action, the
shockwaves would be greater those caused by last month’s resignation
letter of his current successor in Munich, Reinhard Marx.
Ask
around Bavaria, and the surprise resignation by Marx – promptly
rejected by Pope Francis – has divided opinion. Some saw it as a
publicity stunt, others as a so-called Befreiungsschlag, a liberating
push forward for an energetic reformer. In the diocesan headquarters the
cardinal’s deputy, vicar general Christoph Klingan, told me the
initial surprise had now yielded to a period of deep reflection, and a
feeling that the Pope agrees with much of Marx’s analysis. “For Cardinal
Marx, it is about more than just structural questions, it is about our
core: what defines us as a Church?” Fr Klingan explains.
Rarely
has that existential question been more urgent. Some 22.6 million
Germans identify as Roman Catholic, 27 per cent of the population.
(Around 21 million identify as members of the Protestant Churches.) The
boundaries of many of its 27 dioceses stretch back to Boniface and
Charlemagne and largely reflect the old pre-1871 German landscape of
kingdoms, duchies and bishoprics. The dioceses are as rich as they are
diverse thanks to a church tax – 8 to 9 per cent of the income tax of
all those registered as a Catholic in Germany goes to the Church – which
raised €6.76 billion (£5.8bn) in 2019, the highest sum ever. Many
inside the German Church view the tax as a mixed blessing: it bankrolls a
huge range of church social services, but also a vast bureaucracy that
is difficult to steer and, in many cases, wilfully blind to the
approaching cliffs.
In order to leave the Church, German
Catholics have to arrange an appointment with their municipal office and
make a written declaration: 273,000 did so in 2019, up 39 per cent on
the number who left in 1995. The number is almost certain to be much
higher now, given a steady stream of abuse reports and revelations. In
the same period, the number of new priests ordained annually dropped
nearly 350 per cent to just 67 in 2020.
Clerical sexual abuse became a public phenomenon in Germany a decade
ago thanks to Jesuit priest Fr Klaus Mertes who, as head of Berlin’s
elite Canisius College, lifted the lid on abusive clerics on the staff
and revealed the suffering of several former students. In 2010 we had
sat together in his darkened office, wondering if Germany’s Church would
follow Ireland’s into the abyss. How does he view things today?
“The
glass is half full and half empty,” Fr Mertes told me. Going public as
he did 10 years ago shattered the church taboo on discussing sexualised
violence, he recalls. It generated investigative momentum and forced new
child protection structures. The process he triggered, though, has also
catalysed a widening split between those who see clerical sex abuse as
an obligation to pursue a wider project of reform and renewal and those
who view efforts to open the Church to the world – in its teachings, its
structures and its approach to its past – as part of the problem.
Fr
Mertes is critical of how each German bishop has taken his own route,
often commissioning lawyers to investigate abuse and cover-up in their
diocese. That allows them to control investigators’ access to records,
and in some cases even to control whether the report is published. The
only national overview of the extent of sex abuse in the Church was a
2018 study detailing 3,677 victims and 1,670 abusing priests and
Religious. Survivor groups and their allies want more detail – and a
comprehensive independent enquiry.
“What we are lacking in
Germany is a fully independent, non-church investigation committee with
powers to examine files and make decisions.” But, Fr Mertes adds,
“politicians are not interested. This allows progress to be hindered by
groups within the Church well connected within the hierarchy, with a
fundamentalist, reactionary approach to the faith. The best example of
this is Cologne.”
Cologne’s archbishop, Cardinal Rainer Maria
Woelki, is the most outspoken critic within the German hierarchy of the
synodal way – at least he was until Cardinal Walter Kasper made his
unexpected intervention last month. Woelki came under fire for
suppressing a report into clerical sexual abuse he himself had
commissioned. A second report followed this year which identified 135
victims of abuse and 87 abusing priests, and triggered two bishops’
departure. But critics say this second document was careful to avoid one
of the main conclusions of the original report: that church structures
were a key contributory factor to abuse.
The cardinal and his
defenders see themselves as victims of a campaign from opponents who
overlook the need to balance survivor welfare with the rights of those
accused. The damaging row has triggered uproar in the Cologne
archdiocese, Germany’s largest. In January a local priest, Klaus
Koltermann, wrote to Cardinal Woelki warning of “disquiet among the
greatest believers” in his parish of Dormagen. When a local newspaper
reprinted his letter, Woelki’s office warned him by letter of “possibly
serious breaches of your obligations … that could have consequences”.
The threat was withdrawn when Fr Koltermann went public with their
correspondence, a stand-off he describes as a learning experience. “A
new solidarity has to grow amongst us,” Fr Koltermann told me. “We have
to become more courageous. Sadly, we priests never learned to stand up
for our faith – in the Church.”
Pressure on Cardinal Woelki has reached unprecedented levels. In May,
a parish in Düsseldorf disinvited him as celebrant at its confirmation
Mass. Woelki once served as a deacon in the parish, as did two priests
identified as abusers. “You are for us, sadly, no longer credible, we
have lost our trust in you as a bishop,” the parish council told him.
Woelki went ahead with the confirmations. The latest mishandling of an
abuse case linked to Woelki, uncovered by Bild, involves a 16-year-old
homeless youth who had sexual contact with a diocesan priest. When Bild
challenged Woelki’s description of the priest’s actions as “stupidity”
rather than abuse, a diocesan spokesperson hit back at Germany’s most
popular newspaper: “Do you think that every voluntary sexual contact
with a homeless person is exploitative or forced? Are homeless persons
not allowed have sex?”
As a siege mentality grows in Cologne,
Cardinal Woelki is now seen as largely isolated and unreachable. The
recent week-long papal visitation and upcoming report is, senior church
officials say, the last hope to resolve the stand-off. The endless
Woelki drama has had a dramatic effect on the Catholic Church in
Germany, transforming what was a slow-moving car crash into a high-speed
train wreck. Echoing increased demand elsewhere, city officials in
Cologne have increased to 1,500 per month the number of bookable slots
to file an application to leave the Church.
But seasoned inside
observers of the abuse legacy and its investigation say the battle goes
far deeper. “This is really about who controls the narrative in the
Church,” a well placed investigation source told me. “This is about
whether the Church is open to neutral, external [investigators] being
given the power to assess the situation and make proposals for the
future.”
More than a decade after the clerical sexual abuse
reared its head, many church figures in Germany are still speaking of
regrettable individual cases and “bad apples”. There is a reluctance to
acknowledge the systemic nature of the abuse issue – and the systemic
nature of the response, if it is to be successful. Behind public
expressions of regret, many bishops and priests remain unwilling to meet
abuse survivors. “They are literally not able to verbalise this,
anything sexualised is a taboo,” I was told by one person who works
regularly with priests and Religious. “Despite them being trained
pastoral workers, they are often unable to help one another, let alone
anyone else.” And the bishops tend to favour complex, long-term
solutions rather than working quickly to assist survivors by building on
other countries’ painful learning processes. “The main issues have been
on the table here for some time and do not differ largely from those in
other jurisdictions,” says another lay- person who works with Religious
on the abuse legacy. “But the Germans would rather try to reinvent the
wheel, treading water rather than look to reports or expertise in
Ireland, the US and Australia.”
A final, as yet unaddressed issue
is the Church-State relationship. As a so-called Körperschaft des
öffentlichen Rechts, or corporation under public law, the Catholic
Church in Germany is classified by the state as a self-managing body
acting in the public interest. This arrangement, based on laws dating
back to 1919, ostensibly separates Church and State and grants Catholic
dioceses corresponding privileges such as permission to accept donations
tax-free.
But the reality is of close and interweaving
structures and personnel: Germany’s Christian Churches are the largest
providers of kindergartens, schools and nursing homes, and are the
largest employer of teachers and care workers. This has a passive but
palpable effect on the current debate. “There is no real interest from
the state side to look closely or step up pressure on bishops to
expedite their investigations,” a church official familiar with diocesan
enquiries told me.
Post-war German society may be the gold
standard for coming to terms with past dictatorships and related crimes,
but it has yet to apply this expertise to the Catholic Church. Unlike
deferential public officials, German lay Catholics have many channels to
express no confidence in their bishops. Those who choose to stay are
venting their frustration through lay structures that largely mirror
diocesan hierarchical structures. At the head of these is the Central
Committee of German Catholics (ZdK). Its president, Thomas Sternberg,
told me the Church is facing an unprecedented mutiny. But anger at
clerical sexual abuse and its cover-up is only the straw that has broken
the camel’s back. Far deeper, Sternberg argues, lies resentment over
how traditional parishes have been integrated into new sprawling
structures with little lay consultation, a process he says reflects
post-war Germany’s centralisation of power away from parishes and into
the hands of German bishops.
Sternberg told me he can “count on one hand” those who resist
far-reaching reforms to change that. The next meeting of the synod – a
gathering that will include every bishop, representatives from religious
orders, lay movements, dioceses and parishes, together with expert
consulters and observers from other Churches – will be in October. Lay
participants will demand significant reforms, Sternberg says, but they
are well aware of the limits of local bishops’ power to make changes to
church doctrine. Sternberg jokes that the “very German” synodal process –
with its steering groups, working papers and blizzard of detail –
should not distract from how the issues raised here are chiming with
churchgoers worldwide. “We’re not schismatics, we’re not alone, we are
just a little ahead in discussing issues of interest to all,” he told
me. “We are not asking questions, such as on women priests, because we
expect immediate implementation. But there would have been no liturgical
reform without the preparatory work. Every Vatican council needs
preparation and everything is on the table now for such a council.”
Not
everyone shares Sternberg’s optimism that far-reaching reform is being
triggered in Germany. Among some reform-minded Catholics, expectations
are low – and sinking fast. Two years ago in the western Catholic
heartland of Münster, Lisa Kötter began a church strike that grew into
Maria 2.0. Its demands for an equal role for women in the Church, an end
to mandatory celibacy for priests and for a proportionate response to
the catastrophe of clerical sexual abuse are in tune with the public
mood in Germany. And the bishops? They invite me for coffee, Kötter told
me, but remain wary of any public show of support. She is so
pessimistic about the chances of reform – she views the synodal process
as a “simulation” – that she has chosen the Kirchenaustritt – the route
of formal disaffiliation from the Church. “We see the entire
patriarchal basis of the Catholic Church as wrong, and out of step with
the teaching of Jesus,” Kötter says. “They haven’t heard the signs of
the times, the demands for change. Their ears are trained to hear
nothing except their own hymns.”
Many priests are wary of the
synodal pathway for different reasons. Munich priest Fr Stefan Scheifele
is watching the process with a mixture of detached disbelief. “It has
nothing to do with the reality on the ground. The synodal process and
the Catholic lay organisations are disconnected from parishioners,” he
tells me. “People just want good Masses and sacraments. Most have little
time for bishops and structural debates.” That the reform debates will
be existential for the preservation of local Churches and the sacraments
appears lost on many outside the process.
The vicar general in Fr Scheifele’s diocese, Christoph Klingan,
suggests the interminable debates in the Church reflect the “rational”
side to the German character, the desire always to “want to understand
why things are as they are”.
He explains: “We are a society with
high levels of democracy and equal rights for women – and both must be
reflected in our Church.” For Fr Klingan, a successful synodal process
would create a new understanding of the priest as someone who shares
power and responsibility in the parish. It will also have no choice but
to grasp the nettle on other current issues. “We need a different
perspective on the issue of sexuality, and how we approach people whose
lives do not conform to church teaching in its pure form.” He says ways
must be found of including them fully in the life of the Church. There
are two possible futures for the German Church, he tells me. “One path
ahead represents Cardinal Marx’s hope: to win as many people as possible
and to move forward with them, even if they are not 100 per cent with
church teaching.” The alternative might seem bleak or refreshing,
according to taste. “The other path,” says Fr Klingan, leads to a
“small, pure Church”.
Days after we speak, the Bishop of Limburg,
Georg Bätzing, the head of the German bishops’ conference, met Pope
Francis in Rome. Not everyone back home shares Bätzing’s post-meeting
optimism that the Pope is fully behind the German synodal way. The
German Church finds itself at a historic crossroads. And, as 500 years
ago, no one should underestimate the disruptive potential for the
universal Church of angry German Catholics.
Derek Scally is Berlin correspondent of The Irish Times and author of The Best Catholics in the World: The Irish, the Church and the End of a Special Relationship (Sandycove, £16.99; Tablet price £15.29). Oratio can be viewed here: www.robertmehlhart.com/oratio-groesste-urauffuehrung-seit-dem-zweiten-weltkrieg
No comments:
Post a Comment