07 February 2018
The Tablet
The Pope’s integrity is in question
Share this story
The Barros crisis
The affair of the Chilean bishop accused of
covering up serious sexual abuse is indeed a tangled web. If the central
player in the story was anyone other than Pope Francis – for instance a
local politician – the easiest explanation of the sequence of events
now emerging would be that that person was lying – and was also stupid,
as the lie would almost certainly be found out. In the case of Pope
Francis, neither possibility seems plausible.
Indeed, if he had anything to hide, assigning
Archbishop Charles Scicluna to conduct a special investigation into the
case would be like putting his head into the lion’s mouth. Before his
appointment as Archbishop of Malta, Archbishop Scicluna was the chief
Vatican prosecutor in cases of Catholic clergy accused of the sexual
abuse of children. If anyone can unravel this business without fear or
favour, it is he.
The key figure in the affair is a Chilean
layman called Juan Carlos Cruz. As a young man he was a member of an
almost cult-like circle gathered round Fr Fernando Karadima, who was as
sexually corrupt as he was charismatic. Cruz wrote a long letter to the
Pope in 2015 setting out the abuse he had personally experienced and
witnessed at the hands of Father Karadima. He said another member of the
group, a young priest called Juan Barros, had witnessed the abuse in a
similar way. Allegations included kissing and fondling, including
touching genitals. Despite protests, in 2015 Juan Barros was appointed
by Pope Francis as Bishop of Osorno in southern Chile. He has since
offered to resign but his resignation was refused by the Pope.
Father Karadima was clearly guilty. When it
was brought to the attention of the church authorities in Rome, he was
severely sanctioned. Bishop Barros has denied any involvement in the
matter, which is why allegations arose that he was at least complicit in
a cover-up. Some of his fellow bishops have backed him, and Pope
Francis may have relied on that. But much of Chilean public opinion is
not impressed. The rest of the world, which has viewed Pope Francis
favourably till now, is wondering if he has feet of clay.
The heart of the matter concerns what happened
after Señor Cruz’s letter was passed to four members of the commission
on sexual abuse set up by Pope Francis, who gave it to Cardinal Seán
O’Malley, the commission’s chairman. He later confirmed he had given the
letter to the Pope. Yet Pope Francis has denied being aware of any
evidence against Bishop Barros. When in Chile on a papal visit recently,
he accused those making these allegations of baseless calumny. He could
not act without proof, he said. Cardinal O’Malley promptly protested,
saying the Pope’s words were “a source of great pain for survivors of
sexual abuse”. The Pope later corrected himself, saying when he said he
lacked “proof” he meant “evidence”. But the evidence does exist, and was
handed to him. How can Pope Francis claim he did not know about it?
This is no longer just about Bishop Barros. The Pope’s own reputation is
at risk.
No comments:
Post a Comment